If I do interdiff long.1.txt long.2.txt I get this, which must be wrong (both patches to the CC= and CFLAG= lines are the same, so there is no additional patch:
$ interdiff long.1.txt long.2.txt
reverted:
--- makefile Thu Jan 5 05:07:23 1995
+++ makefile.old Thu Aug 8 09:34:44 1991
@@ -18,13 +18,13 @@
MAKE = make # needed for some systems e.g. older BSD
+CC = cc
+CFLAGS =
-#CC = cc
-#CFLAGS =
MODEL =
EXTRA = -DBIG_MEM -DNDEBUG
LINTFLAGS = -DLINT
+OPTIM = -O
+DESTDIR = /usr/local/bin
-OPTIM = $(CFLAGS)
-DESTDIR = $(PREFIX)/bin
#List of all object files created for Zoo
ZOOOBJS = addbfcrc.o addfname.o basename.o comment.o crcdefs.o \
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
@echo "lint_turboc: Run lint under **IX for checking Turbo C/MSDOS code"
# install alpha zoo as "tzoo"
+install:
-inst_test:
mv zoo $(DESTDIR)/tzoo
# install beta zoo as "bzoo"
@@ -75,9 +75,8 @@
mv zoo $(DESTDIR)/bzoo
# install production zoo as "zoo"
+inst_prod:
+ mv zoo $(DESTDIR)/zoo
-install:
- $(INSTALL) $(COPY) $(STRIP) -o $(BINOWN) -g $(BINGRP) -m $(BINMODE) $(TARGETS) $(DESTDIR)
- $(INSTALL) -c -o $(BINOWN) -g $(BINGRP) -m 444 zoo.1 fiz.1 $(PREFIX)/man/man1
# executable targets
TARGETS = zoo fiz
long.1.txt long.2.txt
If I do
interdiff long.1.txt long.2.txt
I get this, which must be wrong (both patches to the CC= and CFLAG= lines are the same, so there is no additional patch:short.1.txt short.2.txt
If I apply
interdiff
only to themakefile
part of the patches, the result looks ok: