Closed erikd closed 1 year ago
Hi @erikd just to let you know that the principal maintainer has this
On March 2nd, I joined the Ukrainian military (the National Guard) to play my small part in defending Ukraine.
@idontgetoutmuch is that Roman?
@erikd yes
On Hackage, the maintainer is listed as Mathieu who I believe is French.
Anyway, I hope Roman stays safe.
The bounds change in 3e6b6804c419adbb53a5923149c4f6063d30d72e seem sa bit funny to me.
- , singletons >= 0.9 && < 3
+ , singletons >= 3
+ , singletons-th >= 3
There's no code change to warrant moving from singletons >= 0.9
to singletons >= 3
, and we don't need singletons-th
.
I will see what I can do.
I seem to recall that singletons
(and maybe also singletons-th
) is tightly version locked with the GHC version. Therefore I usually remove any version bounds on singletons
and let the compiler sort it out.
singletons-th
yes (singletons-th-3.1.1
has base >=4.17 && <4.18
), but singletons
seems to be more lenient (singletons-3.0.2
has base >=4.9 && <4.18
).
@andreabedini gotten somewhere?
@mboes We didn't end up needing to build this package at IOG so I had stopped. I will give it a second look (especially now that #379 is merged).
@andreabedini I saw you opened #381, which creates a whole new cabal
-based CI workflow. The issue reported here can be reproduced with either Stack or cabal-install. It's just that #366 broke building with GHC 8.10. So I extracted the minimal change from your PR that fixes the problem. It's in #384.
Describe the bug
First I ran into https://github.com/tweag/HaskellR/issues/374
Then trying to fix that, I cloned the repo and tried to build it and got:
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior.
Expected behavior I expect it to build
Environment
Additional context Contents of
cabal.project