Closed turion closed 2 years ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 85bbd1494c87971df15d5b8bd2506cb79e833275 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/monad-bayes/deploys/63469665fb225c0008fa7be8 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-211--monad-bayes.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.
Why not use a library definition of a stream? Unnecessary overhead?
Why not use a library definition of a stream? Unnecessary overhead?
Yes, I looked into several libraries. Some were well-built, but complex like https://hackage.haskell.org/package/streaming-0.2.3.1/docs/Streaming.html, some were simple enough like https://hackage.haskell.org/package/streams but seem not active enough to be a reliable dependency.
If you want, I can rewrite with streaming
. I think that would be my first choice.
...but I think that at this point, a dependency would be unnecessary overhead. We're not using any fancy stream manipulation functions (yet).
Fixes #184