Open skleinjung opened 1 year ago
The request is not detailed enough to implement. We need more information about what the SAAS offering should do and what kind of users will be interested in it. Additionally, we need to know if there are any existing features or components in the coco-toolbox project that can be used for this offering.
List three possible SAAS offerings that libraries would want to pay for. Then pick the one most likely to be successful and use that one.
Here are three possible SAAS offerings that libraries might want to pay for:
Of these three options, a library management system is likely to be the most successful. It is a core tool that libraries need to operate, and there are already many commercial vendors in this space. However, we will need to do some market research to determine what features are most important to libraries and how we can differentiate ourselves from existing solutions.
Actually, let's use the third option -- virtual reference service that provides library users with online assistance from librarians. What additional details are needed for you to build this?
To build a virtual reference service, we need to know the following details:
Once we have answers to these questions, we will be ready to implement the virtual reference service.
Thank you for providing the additional details. We have enough information to proceed with building the virtual reference service. We will use Discord chat as the channel for communication between librarians and users. We will also need to work with Ivy League colleges to identify the most important resources to integrate with. We will keep in mind the need for reporting and analytics as we build the service.
None.
Based on the information gathered during the discovery process, the following requirements can be appended to the initial request's description to make it more clear:
Based on the previous issue refinement conversation, there are a few things that the user could have done to make the process easier.
Firstly, they could have provided more context about their organization and the software project they were working on. This would have helped us better understand their needs and provided more specific feedback.
Secondly, when responding to our prompts for additional details, the user could have included additional information beyond the bare minimum needed to answer the question. This would have allowed us to gain a deeper understanding of their requirements and provide more effective solutions.
To update the prompts to get better responses from the language model, we could include more specific examples and scenarios to help guide the user in providing the necessary information. For example, instead of simply asking "What channels will be used for communication?", we could ask "Will chat or video conferencing be used for communication?". This would prompt the user to think more specifically about their requirements and provide more detailed responses.
As for self-criticism, I recognize that in some cases I could have provided more detailed feedback or asked more specific questions to better understand the user's needs. In the future, I will strive to be more thorough in my approach and ensure that I am providing the most effective solutions possible.
Implementation Plan
Impacted Files
None.
Additional Details
Based on the information gathered during the discovery process, the following requirements can be appended to the initial request's description to make it more clear:
Implementation Plan
Implementation Plan
Impacted Files