Closed caniszczyk closed 9 years ago
cc: @johnynek
So in my view, typelevel is a bit more focussed on speaking against harassment, whereas the Twitter one is a bit more passive about it. For instance, I like how the typelevel one specifically invites people who witness harassment. The Twitter one is unclear. Reporting may imply it, but I think it is valuable to make it clear that we invite reports from anyone (victim or witness).
I think this:
Harassment includes offensive comments related to gender or anything to do with it (identity, history,
expression, non-binary gender, etc.), sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size,
race, religion, programming experience or background, sexual images in public spaces, deliberate
intimidation, stalking, following, harassing photography or recording, sustained disruption of
community activities, spaces, or other events, inappropriate physical contact, and unwelcome sexual
attention. Participants asked to stop any harassing behavior are expected to comply immediately.
in particular is good to be clearer.
Agreed @johnynek, I'll put together a PR to address this
I updated our code of conduct and it should fix these issues, sorry @johnynek for the long wait on this, was finalizing the "Open Code of Conduct" at the TODOGroup (http://todogroup.org/opencodeofconduct/) and getting other companies on board too.
https://github.com/twitter/code-of-conduct/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md
Apparently Typelevel has some good examples: http://typelevel.org/conduct