Open idmw opened 11 years ago
Perhaps I misunderstand 2(b) -
against an Entity that has filed, maintained, or voluntarily participated in a patent infringement lawsuit against another in the past ten years, so long as the Entity has not instituted the patent infringement lawsuit defensively in response to a patent litigation threat against the Entity; or
voluntary participation - this could be defensive participation (nothing legal compels you to defend your self - you would simply forfeit, right?).. so arguably all participation, offensive and defensive would be covered here.
Is the intention to capture only those who are plaintiffs rather than defendants?
Im guessing the latter clause is supposed to exempt companies from acting against patent trolls, right?
The reason I ask, is that perhaps you could word the clause differently -
something along the lines of "any entity who, when acting as a plaintiff (or by way of counter claim as a defendant), has utilized or threatened to utilize a patent as the basis of their claim of infringing behaviour on the part of a defendant...
or something like that?
Two quick thoughts.