Closed tlazaro closed 2 years ago
Just found we had #1915 with this work already.
is there any reason why the previous one was not merged @navinvishy ?
Looks like it just got lost somehow...
is there any reason why the previous one was not merged @navinvishy ?
Looks like it just got lost somehow...
Yeah, my bad - I think this just got lost. fwiw we've had these changes at Twitter for a while now.
Updated PR with unit tests from #1915.
I think we were hesitant because of some comments around TINYINT(1) being a BOOLEAN and DATETIME (this one was removed the patch) and both out of topic from the PR.
This code in this PR is what we have had in production for the past 2 years, happy to make changes if it makes sense but otherwise we are satisfied with these changes.
@johnynek do you think we can land this?
sorry for the latency.
I think the complete opposite is the truth, you have been incredibly responsive and helping out so much in such short notice. To the point I worry we are taking too much of your time.
Trying to do some cleanup and have all Twitter internal changes pushed to open source. Please advise on whether this change makes sense as-is and whether there could be consequences for other users.
Will try to add unit tests.