search

twitter / the-algorithm

Source code for Twitter's Recommendation Algorithm
https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-source/2023/twitter-recommendation-algorithm
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
62.3k stars 12.15k forks source link

🤡 badge for climate change deniers (just like you highlight government sponsored propaganda) #1863

Open marsrobertson opened 1 year ago

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Yes. Climate change is a problem. Climate change denial is a problem. Climate change inaction is a problem. Inaction is caused by denial.

Describe the solution you'd like

Renewable energy. Regen agriculture. Reduction in emissions. End the war. The list can go on and on, check my frens at https://planetarycouncil.org

Describe alternatives you've considered

Blowing up the Parliament, just like Guy Fawkes, such a legend: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes_Night

It would get some press, get some attention, also terrorism charges to spend some with Julian Assange (more than 4 years without trial, judicial kidnapping)

Additional context

Fake news. Click baits. Time on site. Engagement metrics. Attention economy. Outrage farming. Not good for mental health.

I'm putting 1 BTC on the line and want to debate a climate change denier with 99-1 advantage. Proof: https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1673724721601314816

PSEUDO ALGORITHM

  1. To begin with, only accounts with 100+ followers, 100+ tweets, that tweeted in the past month
  2. Generate a list of 1000 climate related words, comma separated (that's the exact prompt)
  3. No rocket science (Elon is doing it), simple for loop and if else statement with a counter.
  4. Total number of tweets is low trillions, shouldn't take long, even written in JavaScript on my Apple Watch
  5. Climate words / Total words. Receive a number. Sort by number. Now we know who tweets about the climate.
  6. Only use tweets of the user. Do not count replies for now. Loads of trolls.
  7. Ask the AI. "It this tweet OK with scientific consensus, or is it leaning towards climate change denial"?
  8. 3 strikes rule 🤡
  9. Then run the algo for all the followers
  10. Mars spends some time in HMP Belmarsh with Assange

(you need to do it quickly, otherwise the incentive to voluntarily go to prison is no longer attractive)

PS. Russia is the only country that benefits from climate change. Melting Arctic opens Northwest Passage. If you do not act on climate you are Putin supporter 🤡 (and they never engage in propaganda)

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

The reason why I suggested 🤡 rather than 💩 is because some people genuine like poo emoji.

We can figure out any other label to climate change deniers, does not have to be emoji,

Naim2000 commented 1 year ago

Sorry im not reading allat

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

Trending hashtag appeared in my sphere of consciousness

Literally on top of my personal recommendations:

image

Two top tweets (trivially debunkable)

image

https://twitter.com/namemeifucan/status/1674491357782503437

image

https://twitter.com/theeZR0/status/1674527088789864466

Tried responding and inviting to 1 BTC 99-1 handicap debate

image

Is there already some mechanism in place?

For example, if a tweet receives multiple flags it is automatically not-replyable, not-retweetable?

xTrayambak commented 1 year ago

Least impulsive JavaScript developer

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

Thanks for educating me, I didn't about this meme: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-aint-reading-all-that

image

TLDR

image

🤡 for climate change deniers

xTrayambak commented 1 year ago

Climate change is real, hardly anyone here denies it. Please stop.

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

@xTrayambak

hardly anyone here denies it

image

My estimate (not scientific method) is that climate change deniers are 0.1% to 1% of the global population but they are getting disproportionally too much airtime.

Again, my estimate (not scientific method) is that sometimes we simplify:

A determined climate change denier can cause loads of harm, confusion, inaction... I'm determined climate change activist and I was frustrated that they were quitting on me. No honest troll would quit a heated debate with a guy like me, it didn't make sense. Putin, Russia, Arctic, Northwest Passage hypothesis came to mind.

Have you heard of Metacrisis?

image

image

Source: https://fortune.com/2023/02/15/trust-in-media-low-misinform-mislead-biased-republicans-democrats-poll-gallup/

Lost trust in media - lost trust in government. Who do you trust? Twitter is fast to operate with Elon. And the pseudocode algorithm is relatively easy to implement, get started, improve over time... Cambridge Analytica tech is "genie out of the bottle" and maybe there is a way to repurpose it towards something good?

Of course cannot ban climate change denial - free speech - Streisand Effect - that's why 🤡 emoji to be taken seriously and explaining: "Russia the only country that benefits from melting Arctic, opening Nortwest Passage, fight Putin by fighting climate change"

xTrayambak commented 1 year ago

not reading allat 😄👍

xTrayambak commented 1 year ago

tldr: blah blah blah I am very scientific bleh bleh blah blah bleh blah bleh Putin bad (he technically is) blah blah blah free speech blah blah bleh I am very smart give me validation and internet points blah blah bleh

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

image

Flat Earth is not dangerous.

Climate change denial / confusion / distraction / inaction is.

xTrayambak commented 1 year ago

My guy. I don't believe in God and neither do I believe in the flat earth theory (it doesn't even exist in the religion I've been assigned on paper).

CamoCatX commented 1 year ago

Guys, you're both wrong.

image

https://www.reddit.com/r/cubeearthsociety/

CamoCatX commented 1 year ago

Even Bing search doesn't deny it: image

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

Looks like a triangle to me

image

jackcooperusesvim commented 1 year ago

Bruh. lol. yall are delusional. AI is gonna take over the world in like 3 days.

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

YES BUT

We invite you to join us now on the next phase in our journey to realizing a fully decentralized AGI platform, governed in an effective, stable, fair and transparent manner by the widest group possible. In this way, a beneficial Singularity has a chance to change the world.

— Announcing the Supervisory Council Elections: The Next Step on SingularityNET’s Roadmap to Decentralized Governance

Screenshot-2023-10-04-at-21 07 15

3 mnutes video: https://youtu.be/fWV6UuFLLso

image

Applied here as well: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/initial-100-million-for-expert-taskforce-to-help-uk-build-and-adopt-next-generation-of-safe-ai

image

xTrayambak commented 1 year ago

Please tell me this is satire.

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

Please tell me this is satire.

Genuine satire.

image

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLzPuNL0BKU

Alright, how do you tell the difference between genuine satire and non genuine satire? That's a matter for the courts.

jackcooperusesvim commented 1 year ago

marsrobertson really thinks hes the stuff huh.

marsrobertson commented 1 year ago

marsrobertson really thinks hes the stuff huh. — @jackcooperusesvim

I do not know what I was thinking / really thinking.

You prompted me to think about it.

Quantum mechanics - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics) - observer affecting the observation.

marsrobertson commented 11 months ago

Actually... Maybe this?

IMG_4406

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor - the simplest answer is often correct

Marioood commented 8 months ago

fucking hell can we just publically execute all twitter users at this point?

jackcooperusesvim commented 8 months ago

What kinda fit should I wear to my public execution?

marsrobertson commented 4 months ago

Balanced approach.

Someone tweeted: https://x.com/packyM/status/1799548979656433769

earth flat 2

marsrobertson commented 3 months ago

Tweet: https://x.com/misterduncan/status/1820168563350450324

image

From the news:

image

But the climate deniers 🤡 will always find an explanation:

Science says It is "unequivocal" but the word is too fancy and not everyone understands it:

image

On top of that IPCC are scientics who are paid by the universities, governments, institutions who can benefit from A B C X Y Z.

That's why I like photos like this, they tell a story, and with the traffic they also invite trolls...

Radical 💡💡💡

Climate change denial police bot 🤖👮🚨 Debating at scale.

I enjoy debating and emotions coming out of it, but it can be seen as an unhealthy addiction. Debating at scale that would be something remarkable.

marsrobertson commented 2 weeks ago

One of the most outspoken arguments.

It is clearly a man-made catastrophe, so what do you do with it now?

IMG_9329