Closed twolfson closed 10 years ago
+1 for bypassing sorting I'm using grunt-spritesmith without the CSS part, only the spriting and I need to keep the original order (some kind of PNG animation)
I will not be able to get to this this week. I will post when I am going to take it on. In the meantime, we accept PRs =D
+1 … Today I implemented with spritesmith a loading indicator with a CSS3-Animation similar to this one: http://cssdeck.com/labs/css-image-sprite-animations-with-steps-function
But the frames ended up in an unpredictable order. Based upon the top-down-layout I added a custom layout that sorts the assets by filename. Since this implementation relies on the filenames provided by spritesmith I hesitated to make a pull request.
Maybe the best solution really would be, that there is an option, that the layout algorithm respects the input order.
thx, Karsten
+1
Same exact situation as @JulienCabanes, the sorting was throwing me off. Why sort it at all, though? Aesthetic purposes?
In the meanwhile I had to comment out the sorting, but I wish I had not to.
The initial intent was consistent ordering. Also, from an abstraction perspective, if you are laying items out, you will probably want them to be sorted.
I am almost free to take this on but I will accepts PR in the mean time.
Attempting to take care of this tonight. We will see how far I get.
This has been released in 2.0.0
. There will probably new tests to verify this works coming in spritesmith
(and more option passing in grunt-spritesmith
/gulp.spritesmith
).
Alright, the higher level modules have been upgraded and now support the appropriate options (algorithmOpts
).
spritesmith@0.19.0
, grunt-spritesmith@1.26.0
, gulp.spritesmith@0.5.0
As with Ensighten/spritesmith#25, it would be nice if we could bypass sorting via an option. The layout algorithm would not be as optimal but it allows for the 20% (in 80/20) to get by.