Closed weboverhauls closed 5 years ago
Suggestion 1: return the underline. (highly recommended)
I agree especially because all other links in cutestrap have the underlines
Suggestion 2: provide more visual affordance that the standalone text is a link such as adding an icon.
One should be free to choose an icon set, so I hope cutestrap does NOT include icons
Since this is a link, strange that it's listed under Buttons and the class names say button.
Other frameworks use button style link as well.
Definitely will add the underline, that was just an oversight of mine when developing.
Won't be adding icons, but I might build a light weight icon set at some point in the future to be used in conjunction with cutestrap.
Since this is a link, strange that it's listed under Buttons and the class names say button.
I'd suggest that, to make it clearer, the example should add the btn--link
class to a <button>
, and the <a>
should get another class like btn
instead...
...something like
<button>Default</button>
<button class="btn--secondary">Secondary</button>
<button class="btn--link">Link</button>
<a class="btn" href="#">Link styled as button</a>
Resolved in version 2, also everything will have a focus outline by default.
The text link is not fully accessible since it relies on color alone to denote that it's a link.
Suggestion 1: return the underline. (highly recommended)
Suggestion 2: provide more visual affordance that the standalone text is a link such as adding an icon.
WCAG references: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#visual-audio-contrast-without-color http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/F73.html
PS: Since this is a link, strange that it's listed under Buttons and the class names say button.