Would this be something you would want to provide in the case someone did not want to use Remy's polfill that utilizes cookies for a fallback? I realize that this is not as permanent as a cookie (refreshing will wipe the $cacheFactory values), but some people might want something Angular driven.
This is just a suggestion, any thoughts, comments, or criticisms would be highly appreciated as this is a code that is live on a production level website (tens of thousands of users a day).
tymondesigns
commented
8 years ago
In the midst of supporting private browsing on Safari (it doesn't allow webstorage), our product owner wanted a fallback for storage.
The solution we've provided was a temporary storage fallback, utilizing Angular's
$cacheFactoryand a decorator for angular-locker.Here is a link to the Gist.
Would this be something you would want to provide in the case someone did not want to use Remy's polfill that utilizes cookies for a fallback? I realize that this is not as permanent as a cookie (refreshing will wipe the $cacheFactory values), but some people might want something Angular driven.
This is just a suggestion, any thoughts, comments, or criticisms would be highly appreciated as this is a code that is live on a production level website (tens of thousands of users a day).