Closed MikkelSchubert closed 1 year ago
Merging #68 (73c28c4) into master (cef3707) will increase coverage by
0.04%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #68 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.89% 92.93% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 704 708 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 654 658 +4
Misses 50 50
Files Changed | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
typed_argparse/arg.py | 77.14% <100.00%> (+0.21%) |
:arrow_up: |
typed_argparse/parser.py | 95.41% <100.00%> (+0.05%) |
:arrow_up: |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Thanks for the PR! Yes I'd say exposing the metavar should be fine.
I considered if it was possible to prevent using metavar for bool arguments using the type system, but it only seems possible when using default/dynamic_default and not (what I assume is) the common case where you don't use either. Misusing metavar also doesn't violate type safety, so it didn't seem worthwile to expand the overloads just for that.
Yes that should be fine. I'm actually contemplating to split the tap.arg
into multiple functions so that differences in their interfaces don't have to be modeled entirely via overloads. I haven't thought about how the split will look like exactly (perhaps positional vs non-positional, scalar vs variadic/nargs) but if we'd have a separate group for boolean switches, we could omit metavar
there, making it fully type safe.
Looking at argparse's metavar docs (last paragraph) it seems that it even allows for Optional[str | tuple[str, ...]]
, but that can still be added later if needed.
Looking at argparse's metavar docs (last paragraph) it seems that it even allows for Optional[str | tuple[str, ...]], but that can still be added later if needed.
I have to admit that I forgot about that, but I wouldn't mind drafting a patch for that if you'd like to support that as well.
I have to admit that I forgot about that, but I wouldn't mind drafting a patch for that if you'd like to support that as well.
Not super crucial. It actually raises the question if this is supported consistently across all supported argparse / Python versions. What if e.g. nargs=3
but the tuple only has a length of 2 etc? Will it generate ...
or other repetition markers for nargs="*"
implicitly? For now just supporting str
may suffice.
This patch exposes the
metavar
option and allows you to use more descriptive placeholders in help text. This is especially useful for long command line option, where the default metavars are equally long:becomes
I considered if it was possible to prevent using
metavar
for bool arguments using the type system, but it only seems possible when usingdefault
/dynamic_default
and not (what I assume is) the common case where you don't use either. Misusingmetavar
also doesn't violate type safety, so it didn't seem worthwile to expand the overloads just for that.