Closed TomasMikula closed 8 years ago
This LGTM, but should we also use this in EuclideanRingFunctions and FieldFunctions too?
Right, I will add those. I did this as a preparatory refactoring for #98, so I only did the minimum relevant for that and did not look around.
Added.
Looks good. :+1:
Where does this PR stand? Did we decide to parameterize the RingFunctions
trait?
I thought we did decide to parameterize RingFunctions.
OK great, so we're waiting on that. Thanks!
Check out the new commit.
Oops, turns out I didn't merge the current master to my working copy.
Fixed, let's see what Travis says now.
:+1:
It seemed like an oversight that
object Ring
did not extendRingFunctions
.