Closed non closed 7 years ago
What are you doing up?
Haha, I just realized that I had said I'd start the release process, so wanted to push it along before bed.
:+1:
Great! Assuming things go green I'll merge and release (and then go to sleep).
Sounds good. Sleep well! On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 19:55 Erik Osheim notifications@github.com wrote:
Great! Assuming things go green I'll merge and release (and then go to sleep).
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/typelevel/algebra/pull/200#issuecomment-273390674, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJdu9Qhhz3GbJKOqsEX8c-GHFqMVzcks5rTalCgaJpZM4LmgbJ .
Property failure:
[info] - [algebra.laws.Rat].field.fromDouble *** FAILED ***
[info] GeneratorDrivenPropertyCheckFailedException was thrown during property evaluation.
[info] (Discipline.scala:14)
[info] Falsified after 4 successful property evaluations.
[info] Location: (Discipline.scala:14)
[info] Occurred when passed generated values (
[info] arg0 = 1.9726888167225064E-308
[info] )
[info] Label of failing property:
[info] (2124091560789543/101201126653655309176247673359458653524778324882071059178450679013715169783997673445980191850718562247593538932158405955694904368692896738433506699970369254960758712138283180682233453871046608170619883839236372534281003741712346349309051677824579778170405028256179384776166707307615251266093163754323003131653853870546747392 ?== 998191653946919/50600563326827654588123836679729326762389162441035529589225339506857584891998836722990095925359281123796769466079202977847452184346448369216753349985184627480379356069141590341116726935523304085309941919618186267140501870856173174654525838912289889085202514128089692388083353653807625633046581877161501565826926935273373696) failed
Is that Scala.js or Scala? On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 20:01 Erik Osheim notifications@github.com wrote:
Property failure:
[info] - [algebra.laws.Rat].field.fromDouble FAILED [info] GeneratorDrivenPropertyCheckFailedException was thrown during property evaluation. [info] (Discipline.scala:14) [info] Falsified after 4 successful property evaluations. [info] Location: (Discipline.scala:14) [info] Occurred when passed generated values ( [info] arg0 = 1.9726888167225064E-308 [info] ) [info] Label of failing property: [info] (2124091560789543/101201126653655309176247673359458653524778324882071059178450679013715169783997673445980191850718562247593538932158405955694904368692896738433506699970369254960758712138283180682233453871046608170619883839236372534281003741712346349309051677824579778170405028256179384776166707307615251266093163754323003131653853870546747392 ?== 998191653946919/50600563326827654588123836679729326762389162441035529589225339506857584891998836722990095925359281123796769466079202977847452184346448369216753349985184627480379356069141590341116726935523304085309941919618186267140501870856173174654525838912289889085202514128089692388083353653807625633046581877161501565826926935273373696) failed
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/typelevel/algebra/pull/200#issuecomment-273391550, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJdn2B8A-Hra0Ly-q6gXJ-svZfkdVKks5rTarGgaJpZM4LmgbJ .
It's on the JVM, we skip that test in Scala.js.
They fixed that bug I thought? (In scala.js) On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 20:04 Erik Osheim notifications@github.com wrote:
It's on the JVM, we skip that test in Scala.js.
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/typelevel/algebra/pull/200#issuecomment-273391963, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJdqEKRd7NySkTR0Ceal5-WBSTwT7gks5rTat0gaJpZM4LmgbJ .
It seems like this is a legit bug:
val x = Field[Rat].fromDouble(1.9726888167225064E-308)
BigDecimal(x.num) / BigDecimal(x.den) // 2.098881337614853913158104485839156E-308
Whereas the "expected" part of the test produces 1.972688816722506443225976254345907E-308
as a result (when evaluated the same way).
/cc @tixxit
I'm fine with opening an issue for this, merging this PR, and releasing. But if it's easy to fix it would be nice to do so first.
I think the bug here is in handling sub-normal floating point values. e-307
and above seem fine, but e-308
and below (towards zero) have problems.
Hrmmm - I thought I had handled the case where the implicit 1 drops when exp bits are 0, but maybe not? I'll take a look and see if I can fix it up quickly.
Alright - I got a fix incoming. I'll push to this branch.
@@ master #200 diff @@
==========================================
Files 37 37
Lines 774 776 +2
Methods 713 714 +1
Messages 0 0
Branches 57 58 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 570 573 +3
+ Misses 204 203 -1
Partials 0 0
Powered by Codecov. Last update e9c5b22...cb6e950
👍
I guess we can merge? Since Three of us seem in agreement?
This also upgrades to Scala.js 0.6.14.