Closed adelbertc closed 9 years ago
@non you steered him wrong on Field, my friend.
Of course, it would be cool to have a Galois fields for tuples of Boolean. :) (which is the one exception that pops to mind for standard scala types, but it does not compose this way).
@johnynek Thanks for your feedback, will address them soon! I'm out of town for the weekend so most likely won't be able to do anything until next week.
:+1:
@johnynek I encouraged @adelbertc to add the euclidean ring instance (as well as the erroneous field instance). I'm pretty sure it's OK (although I haven't written a proof yet) but if you are nervous I would be willing to remove it (and obviously apologize to @adelbertc for suggesting the work).
Yeah, I guess it works for a Euclidean Ring, but I noticed that we don't actually have a test for Euclidean Rings. It is currently a TODO and actually just checking the Ring laws.
+1 from me. Added #85
This looks great.
Could you add support for (at least)
PartialOrder
,Semilattice
,EuclideanRing
, andField
?In theory we could support all the other variants (e.g. the commutative versions,
Bands
, bounded lattices) but I'm willing to wait and see if anyone asks for those.