passing any checkerargs results in only a single test case running

[johanatan]

e.g.,

        let checkerArgs = CheckerArguments(replay: .none, maxAllowableSuccessfulTests: 200,
                                           maxAllowableDiscardedTests: 0, maxTestCaseSize: 1000)

i've tried a bunch of different values for maxAllowableSuccessfulTests and maxTestCaseSize yet my property body only runs once when the defaults are overridden.

[CodaFi]

Not any checker args, just the ones that set maxAllowableDiscardedTests to 0. Since this is counterintuitive, you could make the case that this is a bug. But think about it in relation to the other max-settings which are similarly size-inclusive. In that case, after one test has occurred, you have discarded precisely 0 times and hence you have hit the maximum discard threshold. You need to at least set it to 1 to allow the testing loop to continue.

[CodaFi]

I think QuickCheck might have the right idea of making this option a max discard ratio, not a max discard count.

[johanatan]

Honestly I don’t understand the meanings of any of these values. What is a ‘max successes’? Is that the # of times the test is allowed to succeed? And if it succeeds one time beyond that, it fails?

Likewise with the ‘max test case size’? How exactly does this value actually inform the sizes of the generators?

To get this to work, I was basically just cargo culting your example code which uses a max discard of zero (which seems to make sense). Why do you need to discard a test case that passes? Why do you need to discard any test cases?

[johanatan]

Oh, sorry. I missed part of your explanation wrt max discard.

So, if max discard is set to n and I have discarded n times, I should still be fine. It should be on the attempt to discard n+1 times that a problem occurs. This reasoning has the nice property of making the zeroth case work properly.

[CodaFi]

To get this to work, I was basically just cargo culting your example code which uses a max discard of zero (which seems to make sense)

Oh dear, then that's a bug in the sample code or in the semantics of this argument.

[johanatan]

P.S. if it weren't clear, here is where I cargo culted from: https://github.com/typelift/SwiftCheck/blob/cf9958085b2ee1643e541e407c3233d1b76c18ff/Sources/SwiftCheck/Check.swift#L24-L29

[CodaFi]

Yeah, so I see two problems here:

1) The semantics of maxAllowableDiscardedTests is muddy with respect to 0. I agree that your reading is more natural and should probably be the behavior we support going forward. 2) Regardless of what happens with the point above, the sample code in the docs has unintended semantics. We could address this by fixing point 1, or by simply changing the example.

[johanatan]

Yea, I prefer 1 but will change to a value of 1 to workaround for now. Thanks.