Closed K3das closed 1 day ago
The problem is that the translation from BibLaTeX to hayagriva throws out the note. When converting a biblatex::Entry
to a hayagriva::Entry
, it does the following:
if let Some(note) = map_res(entry.how_published())?.map(Into::into) {
if let Some(parent) = book(&mut item, parent) {
parent.set_note(note);
} else {
item.set_note(note);
}
}
At no other point is note
set.
The question therefore is, how to handle "how published": Give it its own hayagriva field or append it to the note?
I believe this should be fixed with #220. It now renders as
Trying the following entry with
chicago-annotated-bibliography.csl
results in no annotation being rendered, whereas the CSL editor renders this annotation.Here's an example project for reference
The Citation Styles Visual Editor renders an annotation like so:
Yet Typst has no annotation: