Closed schmidma closed 2 months ago
I'm not sure whether we should do this or rather remove the show rule for raw figures. I can't find guidance in the IEEE guidelines.
cc: @reknih
You are correct, I also could not find any reference to whether code listings should be called "Fig." or something different. I assumed that this template opts for the "Fig." naming because #31 added this naming scheme to the template. If I include a code listing in the Latex template on overleaf via
\usepackage{listings}
\begin{lstlisting}[language=Python, caption=Python example]
.....
\end{lstlisting}
This is called a "Listing"
So I'd argue to remove the show rule all together. What do you think?
Sounds good.
Closed in favor of #42
This results in the figures containing code blocks and figures containing images to share a common counter. This is necessary, as the code blocks (
raw
figures) are also supplemented withFig.
in the caption.Fixes #39