Open tzhan98 opened 2 years ago
It is not very difficult to type "addapplicant", especially since the target users are fast typers. Also the command has no special characters, and shortening it to addA or addJ is not clear and not intuitive. If we want to add more commands with other objects that starts with A, it will be confusing as well.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: According to the bug triage examples, while "addapplicant" is not extremely long, the issue comes in when most, if not all of your commands end in "XXXapplicant" for those involving applicants. Maybe it can be shortened to "addapp" to differentiate with future commands starting with 'A'. (or maybe rename it to candidate
which can be shortened to cand
to avoid clashing with future commands)
Also, what is your response towards combining tabjob
and tabapplicant
to just tab
?
As a user, when inputting many entries into the application, I would want to simplify and reduce the amount of typing that I do.
addapplicant
can be shortened toaddA
addjob
can be shortened toaddJ
similar formats can apply with
editapplicant
,sortapplicant
etctabjob
andtabapplicant
can be combined into justtab