Applicant can be marked as `interviewed` but interview date will still be `pending`

[tzhan98]

Steps to replicate:

1. Create an applicant with no interview date
2. mark applicant as interviewed

When marking applicant as interviewed, it should change to NIL if interview is not required or prompt the user to enter an interview date for tracking purposes. This is because for an applicant to have been interviewed and have a pending interview date is contradictory.

[soc-se-bot]

Team's Response

Recruiter may add an applicant while being unaware of their interview date. Such details can be added by the recruiter later on.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

• [x] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: However, we are able to edit and update the field to "interviewed" while it still shows "pending interview". This could confuse the user in the future and he would not know if the applicant have been interviewed or pending interview. With 2 contradicting fields: "pending interview" and "interviewed", the user does not know if

A) applicant has been interviewed and he will add the date later on (as you responded)

or

B) applicant has not been interviewed and the entry of "interviewed" was just a mistake

---