Open tzhan98 opened 2 years ago
It is more of a suggestion, to make the life of the user easier. But this is not technically a feature flaw, as the error message is correct in saying that the duplicate field exists.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: Since it is more of a suggestion, should It be a not in scope
instead of rejected
?
If user tries to add a user with valid nric of
S1234567B
, and warningThe edited NRIC of the applicant already exists
appears, the user will have to scroll though potentially 1000 contacts (stated in the NFR) to search for the entry with the duplicate nric ofS1234567B
. This is because the nric of the duplicated entry of the old contact could be the contact that was mistyped.This is also because there is no way of searching or filtering by nric.