nicovideo.jp: breakage

[stm-x]

Prerequisites

• [X] I read and understood the policy as to what is a valid filter issue
• [X] I verified that the issue has not already been reported (use this button to find out)
• [X] I forced an update of my filter lists (how to do this: click "Purge all caches", then click "Update now")
• [X] I did not remove any of the default filter lists, or I verified that the issue is not caused by removing any of the default lists
• [X] I did not enable external filter lists, or I verified that the issue still occurs without enabling external filter lists
• [X] I do not have custom filters/rules, or I verified that the issue still occurs without custom filters/rules
• [X] I am not using another content blocker along uBO
• [X] I verified the issue is not caused by the browser built-in blocker, or DNS blocking (standalone or through VPN)
• [ ] I did not answer truthfully to all the above checkpoints

URL address of the web page

https://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm40984309

Category

breakage

Describe the issue

When googletagmanager.com/gtm.js is blocked, some buttons does not work.

Steps to Reproduce

(Account required)

1. Open the website.
2. Click on the ... symbol just above the video player.
3. Left-click on the second link in the pop-up window that appears.

When uBO is OFF

A new page will open.

When uBO is ON

Page does not open.

Notes

Of the following rules, only the rules that allow tracking have resolved the issue.

@@||googletagmanager.com/gtm.js$script,domain=www.nicovideo.jp @@||googletagmanager.com/gtm.js$script,redirect-rule,domain=www.nicovideo.jp ||googletagmanager.com/gtm.js$script,redirect=noopjs,important,domain=www.nicovideo.jp

Screenshot(s)

Screenshot(s)

 

Configuration

```yaml uBlock Origin: 1.45.2 Chromium: 107 filterset (summary): network: 94431 cosmetic: 45509 scriptlet: 16846 html: 0 listset (total-discarded, last-updated): default: user-filters: 0-0, never JPN-1: 8265-4, 24m easylist: 64783-83, 23m easyprivacy: 30861-1197, 37m plowe-0: 3668-875, 24m ublock-abuse: 76-0, 24m ublock-badware: 4008-109, 24m ublock-filters: 31278-123, 24m ublock-privacy: 258-1, 24m ublock-quick-fixes: 583-16, 24m ublock-unbreak: 1896-45, 24m urlhaus-1: 13725-0, 24m filterset (user): [empty] modifiedUserSettings: [none] modifiedHiddenSettings: [none] supportStats: allReadyAfter: 260 ms maxAssetCacheWait: 194 ms popupPanel: blocked: 9 blockedDetails: nicovideo.jp: 4 amazon-adsystem.com: 1 google-analytics.com: 1 googletagmanager.com: 2 im-apps.net: 1 ```

[stm-x]

I don't want to allow tracking for this minor issue, any suggestions? (Yes, I know I can just right click and open a new tab, but that's a bit cumbersome.)

[stm-x]

@Yuki2718

[Yuki2718]

No other way than @@||googletagmanager.com/gtm.js$script,domain=www.nicovideo.jp as we can't touch isInterceptEnabled (nicovideo.jp##+js(rc, ClickInterceptor, , stay asap) doesn't work).

[Yuki2718]

@ryanbr

[stm-x]

No other way than @@||googletagmanager.com/gtm.js$script,domain=www.nicovideo.jp as we can't touch isInterceptEnabled (nicovideo.jp##+js(rc, ClickInterceptor, , stay asap) doesn't work).

That' s unfortunate. Thank you for your time.

[stm-x]

Good news. With the renewal of the site, the above features have disappeared, so no more exceptions are needed.

I have blocked Google Tag Manager since yesterday and there seems to be no problem.

This is the best change I know of that Nico Nico has made.

[Yuki2718]

As far as I know the service just restarted after the attack, so maybe safer to watch for a while.

[stm-x]

As far as I know the service just restarted after the attack, so maybe safer to watch for a while.

That's right. Let's see how it goes for a month or so.

[Yuki2718]

@stm-x Do you still have GTM blocked and see no problem?

[stm-x]

I have blocked it for a long time, seems to be no problem. FYI, I use the following rule. ||googletagmanager.com/gtm.js$important,script,redirect=googletagmanager.com/gtm.js:5,domain=www.nicovideo.jp

[Yuki2718]

Can you test for a while without redirect?

[stm-x]

Can you test for a while without redirect?

Okay, This is correct, right? I'll give it a week or so.

[stm-x]

@Yuki2718 Looks fine to me. I think the rule can be removed.

[Yuki2718]

Thanks, removed the exception.