Closed spirillen closed 3 years ago
Seems likely to share script
Do you know which script is being shared ? If so, URL ?
Redirects to login page.
Redirects to login page.
Oh yeah, forgot to write about that on the login page.... its rather simple :smile: As I'm not interested in having mypdns.org marked as porn..... By any lists nor search engines. Therefore it is an internal repo. Just singin and you are there. It also have relation to the fact I'm unable to load a "Are 18+ to enter" script. this way you need to do something acutly to actually get acces.
You should be able to use both github and gitlab oauth login api's
Do you know which script is being shared ? If so, URL ?
Nope, only it's very likely a hardcoded (included directly on page), when I Do these lists (submissions) they are "Drop offs" for those with a better knowledge of js than me.
https://github.com/easylist/easylist/issues/9079
Are those all the urls ?
Are those all the urls ?
Nope, that's only from this afternoon :smile: most of the remaining open issues by @molink36 are related
Seems likely to share script
Do you know which script is being shared ? If so, URL ?
Redirects to login page.
You should now see the following text on the login screen. https://mypdns.org/infrastructure/workboard/-/issues/22
Please add any suggestion you feel likes in the linked issue
maybe just copy & paste domains from the BIG AdGuard filter to the uBO filter
I disagree, on these sites often scriptlet doesn't work for race condition (story is different for AG apps independent of browser) hence I often use $inline-script
or nostif (more robust to race condition) instead of scriptlet to abort/override popit. If we copy and paste, it's likely ending up adding many useless filters for uBO.
I don't think we have to fix all. I already explained my aim in EL repo.
So what determines which pages will be fixed and which will not be fixed?
Amount of time we can spent. If one comes with a report of thousands of domains, it will never be addressed.
What about the approach: fix all or none.
Don't fall in perfectionism. Fixing some is far better than no fix.
So what determines which pages will be fixed and which will not be fixed? Popularity?
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/7468#issuecomment-635422293
what gorhill said.
Specifically the second sentence --
Those filters should be added because someone, an actual visitor, reported an issue on a specific site, not because a crawler suggests we do so.
Those 8000 or something are not going to get fixed just for the sake of fixing, so only the ones reported in EL issue.
In the past, not anymore. I would have declined fixing those also if I had participated back then, it was pointless as those domains were also pulled from the crawler like you're doing. We're not going to fix domains pulled from the crawler.
spirillen, as seen, in this case, websites must be reported separately, and try to not to exceed ~10 per day.
I don't think so.... The future looks like zero will be reported.
Before reading, be aware I'm pissed off, that you believe I only here to give and never get...
PS: You are WAY over your head here: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/9968#issuecomment-918172121 Please stick to what you know and ask for the rest.
he wanted so badly to fix all the porn sites he found)
Why not just create his own filter list for this? We do not want to unduly bloat uBlock filters with speculated solutions to speculated issues -- and also it could very well be that nobody visits sites found by a crawler.
Why am I writing in this repo, your clearly doesn't understand what I'm writing anyway and keeps sailing down a road that never have existed...
So let me put in plain schoolyard language
I'll give a fuck in blackilisting porn in any way shape or form, I solely does this for 2 reasons, 1 help other, 2 transfer it into RPZ AND clean lists.
I visit this site twice, one time with the www and one time without the www = I give a damned if anything gets fixed, I have the screenshot, @funilrys/pyfunceble handle the rest and nobody else who would have a verification of proof can find the more or less sfw srenshot in the representing issue (Why one domain = one issue)
I do not have any gain by posting these issue to you, it is everyone else who might visit the sites later and I only post these bulks list as it seems plausible they share bad scripts.
Why not just create his own filter list for this?
@gorhill it is called adult.mypdns.cloud and runs on port 53? And as Dane, who gave the porn free as the first in 1972, I do not have any issues with this.
AS said, it is for everyone else. If you find something useful, fine otherwise nobody died today.
Should we get this one back on track please and stop turning things upside down #:unamused:
Hey @felix-22 thanks for reaching out to get back to the middle and be able to talk with each other in a better manor.
I'm very open to this and have been giving it some thoughts myself for doing the same.
First of, what is your native language since you are using a translator?? Maybe I happen to know some words that could make it easier for us to communicate.
So let me explain what happen from my perspective.
Where things started to go wrong, is not the "post 10 a day", not even close, it was the drop that tipped it all on a bad day. where I got worn out by a lot reporting of things that should have been rather straight forward.
The hole down-spiral actually stared by another comments of your, which I can't find right now, but something about I would like to block all the porn in the world...! Then you posted the "10 a day" like you completely forgot who actually requested this issue in the first place....
@felix-22 wrote in https://github.com/easylist/easylist/issues/9079#issuecomment-917624839 If so, then you most likely want to report them to uAssets Tracker, because they can't be fixed in EasyList...
So what happend
So from my perspective it started to looks like you was trying to make me responsible for things you requested yourself and at the same time accusing me for things I never have said or even indicated to have any interests in. Maybe who should be careful about telling third-parties (the lost comment from before) what other want's, thinks or believes in without being certain.
I hope your translator can hack this one, and try control your accusations i the future.
Prerequisites
I tried to reproduce the issue when...
URL(s) where the issue occurs
A bit unorthodox but in this case I would like to reference to https://github.com/easylist/easylist/issues/9079 for all preliminary informations
Describe the issue
Exit redirect / pop-(up|under)
Screenshot(s)
Follow the links:
uBlock Origin version
uBlock Origin 1.37.2
Browser name and version
FF + Tor
Settings
But a little export button could be smart
Notes
This is my followup from https://github.com/easylist/easylist/issues/9079#issuecomment-917634576