There seems to be a common confusion when comparing historical station data (as a climatological baseline) to future projected 20km pixel output. The results don't align well in some places/cases.
Do we add a blurb to the intro for this? "If you want to compare future data to historical station data, you'll need to do bias correction."
There seems to be a common confusion when comparing historical station data (as a climatological baseline) to future projected 20km pixel output. The results don't align well in some places/cases.
Do we add a blurb to the intro for this? "If you want to compare future data to historical station data, you'll need to do bias correction."