I have found some inconsistencies in raw CMIP6 outputs with tasmin and tasmax.
It appears that some of the GFDL-ESM4 historical daily tasmin and tasmax data has some cases where tasmin > tasmax. Here is a screenshot, looking at 1850-01-18 DTR:
This discrepancy is present in the regridded data as well, which is how I discovered this.
I have not explored other models/scenarios yet, but we should maybe consider performing a scan on the daily data.
At first I though, this might just be a literal edge case though, as we know the boundary pixels of models can be questionable. But then I noticed it does occur further "inside" as well, albeit seemingly less often.
Also the discrepancies are not severe. The largest difference across the entire regridded GFDL-ESM4 historical dataset (all days in 1850 through 2014) is only -1.5406494.
I am going to send a message to the contact for the GFDL-ESM4 model and get their thoughts.
I have found some inconsistencies in raw CMIP6 outputs with tasmin and tasmax.
It appears that some of the GFDL-ESM4 historical daily tasmin and tasmax data has some cases where tasmin > tasmax. Here is a screenshot, looking at 1850-01-18 DTR:
This discrepancy is present in the regridded data as well, which is how I discovered this.
I have not explored other models/scenarios yet, but we should maybe consider performing a scan on the daily data.
At first I though, this might just be a literal edge case though, as we know the boundary pixels of models can be questionable. But then I noticed it does occur further "inside" as well, albeit seemingly less often.
Also the discrepancies are not severe. The largest difference across the entire regridded GFDL-ESM4 historical dataset (all days in 1850 through 2014) is only -1.5406494.
I am going to send a message to the contact for the GFDL-ESM4 model and get their thoughts.
(code used in screenshots)