wwarriner
commented
1 year ago List (and whether to keep/remove admonition)
Pages needing work:
- policies.md (please check)
- data_management/code_storage.md (don't have key purpose of page)
- education/case_studies.md (page needs formatting at the very least)
- grants/budgets.md (empty)
- grants/facilities.md (empty)
- grants/overview.md (empty)
- grants/publications.md (detailed grant descriptions)
- kubernetes/startup.md (stubby, on my todo list for the quarter)
- national_ci/nih.md (empty)
- national_ci/nsf_access.md (empty)
- national_ci/osg.md (empty)
- workflow_solutions/getting_software_with_git.md (empty, on my todo list eventually)
- workflow_solutions/shell.md (facl commands, on my todo list eventually)
- workflow_solutions/using_workflow_managers.md (on my todo list eventually)
Remove admonition:
- cheaha/software.md
- contributing/contributor_guide.md
- education/social_media.md
- uab_cloud/tutorial/instance.md (remove all)
- uab_cloud/snapshots.md (stubs for sharing snapshots)
- workflow_solutions/git.md (overview of git commands)
- data_management/transfer/globus.md (setting up globus server)
- data_management/storage.md
What would you like to see added?
Assess pages with the "The information on this page is under construction and some of it may be obsolete. If you need additional clarifications in the meantime, please contact us." admonition and determine whether that's still accurate.
Example: https://docs.rc.uab.edu/data_management/storage/ has the admonition, but is it really true? We've updated that section quite extensively and leaving that at the top and potentially undermines researcher confidence in the docs.