Open amullen01 opened 4 months ago
Figures from @Benjamin-Maglio showing differences in potential evapotranspiration (PET) and liquid water content (LWCLAYER) when using Pa (VPD change) vs. hPa (Reference) as the vapor pressure unit. Run is from a bog site.
There is a potential discrepancy in the units for vapor pressure input.
Older input files (pre-2023) have vapor pressure in hPa. Input file metadata and documentation all specify that input vapor pressure should be in hPa.
Newer input files (~2023-onward) have vapor pressure in Pa, although input file metadata still says hPa.
@tobeycarman identified which functions are affected by vapor pressure:
It appears that all of the 'science' functions expect vapor pressure to be in Pa, but this could use further confirmation. This may mean that older CMTs calibrated with vapor pressure in hPa may need to be recalibrated for the new inputs. I also wonder how this affects the 'default' parameterizations for soil hydrology.
I ran my calibration for Caribou-Poker Black Spruce that was originally calibrated using Pa for vapor pressure, with vapor pressure in hPa.