Closed davidfee5 closed 2 years ago
I think it would be helpful to return the figure handle
h
in addition to thefig
instance.
I don't think I understand what you mean. What is a figure handle? Usually, to modify the output figure I'll just do, e.g.,
fig = plot_time_slice(...)
fig.axes[0].set_title(...)
etc.
It is for modifying things that have already been plotted, such as the grid center. h
is defined here: https://github.com/uafgeotools/rtm/blob/0d100ea142fa4200579a21da8169eaeec42b7b20/rtm/plotting.py#L198
and say I want to remove the grid center I'd want to access the handle h
to do something like
h[0].remove()
h=h[1:]
Ah, I see. Yeah, we could return them, or you could use
fig = plot_time_slice(...)
h, _ = fig.axes[0].get_legend_handles_labels()
per get_legend_handles_labels()
docs...
If the issue was that we can't access the handles, then the above is the solution and no modification is required. If the above is too hacky, and we're modifying things frequently, then I suppose we could refactor. I've just never personally had to do that!
Aha! That works just fine. I looked around for a way to do that but couldn't figure it out for some reason. I think this will work and will close this issue. Thanks!
I often find myself wanting to modify the default plot in
plot_time_slice
. I think it would be helpful to return the figure handleh
in addition to thefig
instance. It would be easy to add here: https://github.com/uafgeotools/rtm/blob/0d100ea142fa4200579a21da8169eaeec42b7b20/rtm/plotting.py#L269 but we would have to modify the example and some other codes probably. What do you think?