Closed tian-2024 closed 1 month ago
Yes, the evaluation for human3.6m was definitely time consuming. And for the unaligned human3.6m dataset I used this repository to install/process the dataset. This discards frames that are too similar.
And I dont have the datasets downloaded anymore but those lengths look right to me.
Yes, the evaluation for human3.6m was definitely time consuming. And for the unaligned human3.6m dataset I used this repository to install/process the dataset. This discards frames that are too similar.
And I dont have the datasets downloaded anymore but those lengths look right to me.
Thank you so much!! I tried to find the file for long time and failed, your advice is very useful and important~
Hi, I would like to verify if the dataset sizes I printed here are correct.
It seems that for Human3.6M, the aligned and unaligned datasets have different paths. My assumption is that the aligned dataset is the one previously downloaded, while the unaligned dataset uses the original dataset with some images filtered out.
Additionally, since the evaluation batch size is set to 1, would this process be very time-consuming, especially for the Human3.6M dataset?
The below are time records of my experiments:
I guess human36 evaluating will be 60 hours?