Closed lenglund closed 6 years ago
@lenglund / @andrew-gardener regarding the actual logic changes, I have a couple of questions:
Thanks in advance
I think we only update the logic if a self-eval start/end date has been added. Otherwise, we treat this as the final step in comparing (i.e., leave as-is).
So IF a self-eval date is added THEN: 1a) Self-eval can be available without finishing comparisons (as it is now a separate step and not the final step in comparing). 1b) Comparison period open or closed doesn't matter. 1c) Under this condition does not occur.
2a) The only constraint I suppose would be start date has to fall after the answer end date and end date has to fall before course end date (if one exists?). This means self-eval could come before, during, or after comparisons. What do you think @andrew-gardener? Am I overlooking complexities or other logic here? 2b) Yes. 2c) Yes.
3) How do we handle entering comparison start/end date? I think we require neither or both. Suggest the same approach here.
2a) The only constraint I suppose would be start date has to fall after the answer end date and end date has to fall before course end date (if one exists?). This means self-eval could come before, during, or after comparisons. What do you think @andrew-gardener? Am I overlooking complexities or other logic here?
This sounds fine to me
How do we handle entering comparison start/end date? I think we require neither or both. Suggest the same approach here.
We currently require neither or both for start/end date.
So that would mean that:
Currently students are automatically redirected to self-eval after comparisons completed. I think we'd still want this to happen.
I assume when there is a self-evaluation period we would not want to automatically redirect to self-eval after comparisons are completed at all (even if it could be completed afterwards).
Perfect. Thanks to both of you for your input.
Right now, we treat self-evaluations as an "add-on" for comparisons. Instructors are interested in using this in a more robust way, in particular to encourage students to reflect on the feedback they receive. So having the option for self-evaluations to happen at a later stage in the overall process.
This requires:
Something else we might want to consider is having a checkbox for the instructor to explicitly select if the self-eval is to evaluate based on other answers or peer feedback. This could then dictate if we show/link to the student's completed comparisons or received feedback when they are on the self-eval screen.