Open chadlagore opened 6 years ago
Seems like a sensible naming convention to me!
How about we do <model-type>-<number-of-base-layers>-<number-of-transfer-layers>-<user-id>
? Seems like quite a few people want to add their own models.
It would be nice to capture the model architecture uniquely somehow in the name—perhaps Keras provides such a checksum? I haven't been able to find it in their API 😞
Our current base model (
cnn
) could be named better. Which makes me think, perhaps we could use a naming convention. Something like:So this model would become
cnn-1-2
.