Open scut-salmon opened 5 years ago
Running the eval code given with the trained weights for the 101 resnet:
BBOX:
2019-06-24 15:10:53,159 | base_dataset.py | line 718: ~~ Summary metrics ~~
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.443
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.658
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.482
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.267
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.480
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.590
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 1 ] = 0.347
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 10 ] = 0.541
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.566
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.378
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.604
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.710
SEGM:
2019-06-24 15:11:44,648 | base_dataset.py | line 718: ~~ Summary metrics ~~
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.389
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.621
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.413
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.184
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.416
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.584
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 1 ] = 0.316
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 10 ] = 0.481
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.501
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.300
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.539
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.674
Hi, I find that UPSNet mainly add an semantic segmentation head to mask RCNN, I wonder what's the performance of UPSNet on object detection(or instance segmentation). Can I use it to improve my object detection MAP? Sorry but I didn't find this discuss in your paper.
I would be appreciated if you could give me some advice, thanks.