Closed ketsiambaku closed 1 month ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 67.99%. Comparing base (
edc5880
) to head (22bfd07
). Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
Files with Coverage Reduction | New Missed Lines | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
common/task/weighted_round_robin_task_scheduler.go | 2 | 89.05% | ||
service/matching/tasklist/task_list_manager.go | 2 | 76.48% | ||
common/persistence/sql/sqlplugin/mysql/task.go | 2 | 73.68% | ||
service/history/task/transfer_active_task_executor.go | 2 | 72.72% | ||
service/matching/tasklist/matcher.go | 2 | 88.66% | ||
service/history/task/fetcher.go | 2 | 85.57% | ||
common/persistence/sql/sqlplugin/mysql/db.go | 2 | 79.49% | ||
service/worker/scanner/executor/runq.go | 3 | 85.48% | ||
common/archiver/filestore/historyArchiver.go | 4 | 80.95% | ||
service/frontend/api/handler.go | 6 | 62.2% | ||
<!-- | Total: | 116 | --> |
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 018faadd-0f68-4f46-a937-a0c09b154ebd: | 0.02% |
Covered Lines: | 102455 |
Relevant Lines: | 147418 |
What changed? Introduced the following tests in service/history/decision:
TestHandleDecisionRecordMarker
TestHandleDecisionScheduleActivity
TestHandleDecisionCancelWorkflow
Why? improve code coverage in the package
How did you test it? unit tests
Potential risks
Release notes
Documentation Changes