Closed jakobht closed 2 weeks ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 72.33%. Comparing base (
ceff8ca
) to head (c40121a
).
Files with Coverage Reduction | New Missed Lines | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
service/history/queue/timer_queue_processor_base.go | 1 | 77.66% | ||
service/history/task/transfer_standby_task_executor.go | 2 | 86.33% | ||
service/matching/tasklist/task_list_manager.go | 2 | 76.05% | ||
common/util.go | 2 | 91.84% | ||
service/history/handler/handler.go | 3 | 96.2% | ||
<!-- | Total: | 10 | --> |
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 0190167e-35fa-415a-84db-56b7e95361ae: | 0.01% |
Covered Lines: | 106527 |
Relevant Lines: | 149124 |
What changed? Added new metric which gives the max per workflow ID rps we have seen for the domain every second
Why? This will help users understand how close they are to the per workflow ID rate limits
How did you test it? Unit tests
Potential risks Just adding a metric, so should be safe
Release notes
Documentation Changes