coveralls
commented
6 days ago Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 01904b5e-fa94-443e-950d-c1952ed2ee13
Details
- 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
- 33 unchanged lines in 9 files lost coverage.
- Overall coverage increased (+0.007%) to 71.54%
| Files with Coverage Reduction | New Missed Lines | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| common/task/weighted_round_robin_task_scheduler.go | 2 | 88.56% | ||
| common/task/fifo_task_scheduler.go | 2 | 82.47% | ||
| service/matching/tasklist/matcher.go | 2 | 90.91% | ||
| service/matching/tasklist/task_reader.go | 2 | 77.72% | ||
| service/history/queue/timer_queue_processor_base.go | 3 | 77.87% | ||
| common/persistence/statsComputer.go | 3 | 98.21% | ||
| service/history/task/fetcher.go | 3 | 86.6% | ||
| service/history/task/transfer_standby_task_executor.go | 6 | 86.94% | ||
| service/history/queue/transfer_queue_processor.go | 10 | 56.49% | ||
| <!-- | Total: | 33 | --> |
| Totals | |
|---|---|
| Change from base Build 01903cd7-c1ac-49f3-a7a4-fe9da6c16ce7: | 0.007% |
| Covered Lines: | 106765 |
| Relevant Lines: | 149238 |
What changed?
Allow "." and "-" in search attribute keys.
Why?
This is needed for indexing context header in search attributes
How did you test it?
Potential risks
Release notes
Documentation Changes