Open working-estimate opened 4 years ago
I can see how this is confusing. Meanwhile, consider using `"^x_1$" to guarantee full string match.
I was considering to introduce #446. It may be a better behavior for the regex matching. What do you think?
I was considering to introduce #446. It may be a better behavior for the regex matching. What do you think?
LGTM
In
make_schema_view()
the regex is:The end result is that if the parquet file contains the columns:
x_1, x_2, ... x_10, x_11
and we provide
schema_fields=x_1, x_2, x_3
when callingmake_batch_reader()
the function will return a unischema with the fieldsx_1, x_10, x_11
which is clearly wrong. The schema should return with the fieldsx_1, x_2, x_3