For tables where the majority of 'columns' are abstracted under a top-level column, e.g. body or msg, we don't surface the struct accessor as the column name, rendering analysis of these queries unusable.
Ideally, if we had a msg.name, msg.attrs.foo, msg.attrs.bar struct, we'd see the leaf struct names as the column name, i.e. msg.name, msg.attrs.foo, etc. Instead, we currently see msg for all of them.
For tables where the majority of 'columns' are abstracted under a top-level column, e.g.
body
ormsg
, we don't surface the struct accessor as the column name, rendering analysis of these queries unusable.Ideally, if we had a
msg.name, msg.attrs.foo, msg.attrs.bar
struct, we'd see the leaf struct names as the column name, i.e.msg.name
,msg.attrs.foo
, etc. Instead, we currently seemsg
for all of them.