Closed vinodnaikb closed 2 years ago
Hello @vinodnaikb, thank you for submitting the issue. I can confirm that I get the same expression for explicit form of the LLG equation as you have mentioned in the document in the presence of Slonczewski terms. I will be opening a PR soon to rectify it.
This issue could be related to #215.
Thanks a lot, @swapneelap!
Thank you for the immediate response. On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 8:26 PM, Swapneel Amit Pathak @.***> wrote: Hello @vinodnaikb, thank you for submitting the issue. I can confirm that I get the same expression for explicit form of the LLG equation as you have mentioned in the document in the presence of Slonczewski terms. I will be opening a PR soon to rectify it.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@fangohr @JLeliaert @marijanbeg @swapneelap @samjrholt Slonczewski ubermag documentation-discrepancy.pdf
I feel there are discrepancies in the 'signs' in the documentation of the Slonczewski STT term. I have attached a document regarding the same. I request the Ubermag team to check this.