Closed KylinGuo closed 1 year ago
@KylinGuo Thank you for pointing this out. I can confirm that whilst the code is correct the expression given in the API documentation has an additional $2 m0 e U$ term. This has now been updated on the master branch of mag2exp and will appear on the website when we next update it.
The relativistic wavelength expression given at the following page
is wrong. See the image below.
Please correct it. One could find the details at the following page
It was given in Chinese but the result is quiet straightforward.