Closed swapneelap closed 1 year ago
Is any of the tests actually running a simulation with time-varying
Xf_ThermSpinXferEvolver
? If not, we should add a test tomicromagnetictests
.
Yes absolutely! I will add tests. I am also thinking it would be good to reorder a few things in oc.script
when it comes to simulations at finite temperature. For example, it is redundant to to ask user for an evolver if both mm.Slonczewski
and system.T
are defined since oc.Xf_ThermSpinXferEvolver
is the only suitable option (?).
Patch coverage: 100.00
% and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
a8efd2c
) 93.45% compared to head (581a22f
) 93.45%.
:exclamation: Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
@lang-m if this is good for now, should we close this? There relevant test is here.
@swapneelap Have you created an issue to remind us to rework the tests and get access to mif string? Once that is done, you can merge.
@swapneelap Have you created an issue to remind us to rework the tests and get access to mif string? Once that is done, you can merge.
Done!
Is any of the tests actually running a simulation with time-varying
Xf_ThermSpinXferEvolver
? If not, we should add a test tomicromagnetictests
.