Closed 0x4007 closed 3 weeks ago
I set this to urgent because this unassignment capability has an outsized effect on our organization's throughput.
I think that a ton of tasks get "reserved" and removed from the DevPool from people who forget to do them.
This reminds, and even offers a disincentive (disqualification) if contributors don't fulfill their promises.
@Keyrxng the deadline is at Thu, Sep 12, 11:24 AM UTC
View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
Issue | Task | 1 | 100 |
Review | Comment | 6 | 0 |
Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
Resolves #19 - fallback to assignment event timestamp if the bo… | 0content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 2 multiplier: 0 score: 1 ul: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 22 multiplier: 0 score: 1 li: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 2 multiplier: 0 score: 1 multiplier: 0 | 0.8 | - |
My bad QA: https://github.com/ubq-testing/user-activity-watche… | 0content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 24 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 img: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 1 multiplier: 0.2 score: 0 multiplier: 0 | 1 | - |
https://github.com/ubq-testing/command-start-stop/issues/19 <… | 0content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 60 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 code: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 1 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 img: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 1 multiplier: 0.2 score: 0 multiplier: 0 | 1 | - |
here is a clear cut example from that same run. self assigned v… | 0content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 18 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 img: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 1 multiplier: 0.2 score: 0 multiplier: 0 | 1 | - |
Here is a run I just done with a `5m` warning and `1… | 0content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 27 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 code: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 1 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 img: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 1 multiplier: 0.2 score: 0 multiplier: 0 | 1 | - |
fixing ci rn, new log means update tests. Tedious but essential … | 0content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 53 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 code: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 3 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 multiplier: 0 | 1 | - |
View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
Issue | Specification | 1 | 10.02 |
Issue | Comment | 1 | 4.158 |
Review | Comment | 3 | 2.35 |
Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
It appears as though the software checks for the metadata from t… | 10.02content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 62 multiplier: 0.1 score: 1 multiplier: 3 | 1 | 10.02 |
I set this to urgent because this unassignment capability has an… | 5.94content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 54 multiplier: 0.2 score: 1 multiplier: 1 | 0.7 | 4.158 |
Where's QA link? Code looks fine. | 0.52content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 7 multiplier: 0.1 score: 1 multiplier: 1 | 1 | 0.52 |
Is there a simple way you can prove that this works in some mock… | 1.44content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 23 multiplier: 0.1 score: 1 multiplier: 1 | 1 | 1.44 |
Fix CI and lets merge. | 0.39content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 5 multiplier: 0.1 score: 1 multiplier: 1 | 1 | 0.39 |
View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
Review | Comment | 3 | 4.79 |
Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
The code seems to be indented with 4 spaces instead of the usual… | 1content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 15 multiplier: 0.1 score: 1 multiplier: 1 | 1 | 1 |
Should use the logger, and indent seems wrong. | 0.59content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 8 multiplier: 0.1 score: 1 multiplier: 1 | 1 | 0.59 |
I think what we are trying to solve is users that self assign th… | 3.2content: p: symbols: \b\w+\b: count: 59 multiplier: 0.1 score: 1 multiplier: 1 | 1 | 3.2 |
It appears as though the software checks for the metadata from the /start comment.
This is incorrect because there are various ways to assign people without that command.
Check the timeline for assign events and target this timestamp.
The correct logic can be lifted from bot v1.
Example of it not working as expected: https://github.com/ubiquibot/conversation-rewards/issues/92