Open 0x4007 opened 4 months ago
Leverage game theory and incentivize reviewers to post a review before the others.
For example, the first to review gets $100 reward and the others get $50 reward.
We could also consider a linear drop off depending on how long the review was available for.
For example if a pull is ready for review, we make available the full reward ($100) and then after 3.5 days it's $0
1.75 day delay would be $50
So it's a linear drop off in the reward and this is calculated based on how long it took the reviewer to get around to it.
This could carve out dedicated reviewer roles which might be useful for speeding up merges
Leverage game theory and incentivize reviewers to post a review before the others.
For example, the first to review gets $100 reward and the others get $50 reward.
We could also consider a linear drop off depending on how long the review was available for.
For example if a pull is ready for review, we make available the full reward ($100) and then after 3.5 days it's $0
1.75 day delay would be $50
So it's a linear drop off in the reward and this is calculated based on how long it took the reviewer to get around to it.
This could carve out dedicated reviewer roles which might be useful for speeding up merges