Compatibility for CommonJs and ESM

[gentlementlegen]

The package is currently only compiled for ESM projects, which implies adding the "type": "module". This usually breaks projects that are using older techs requiring "type": "commonjs", which is broadly used within our organization and the packages we include. It would be better to offer both solutions, as this package doesn't require to be in ESM to work properly.

Tasks to be carried out:

• bundle for both ESM and CommonJs
• pack them properly with input entries
• make sure it works with module and commonjs

[ubiquibot[bot]]

@gentlementlegen, You are not allowed to add Priority: 1 (Normal)

[ubiquibot[bot]]

@gentlementlegen, You are not allowed to add Time: <1 Hour

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! No permission to set labels

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! No permission to set labels

[0x4007]

I think setting permissions is broken last time we tried. Can make you billing manager though. Will need to try when back on computer later.

[gentlementlegen]

@0x4007 Well I am billing manager within Ubiquity Org, so the issue might be different. Yes I recall it being broken as well. It's not urgent I guess, just a bit annoying 😄

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! No price label has been set. Skipping permit generation.

[ubiquity-os-main[bot]]

! No price label has been set. Skipping permit generation.

[ubiquibot[bot]]

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

[ubiquity-os-main[bot]]

[ 0 WXDAI ]

@0x4007

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	1	0

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
I think setting permissions is broken last time we tried. Can ma…	2.5 content: p: count: 25 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	-	-

[ 35.62 WXDAI ]

@gentlementlegen

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Task	1	25
Issue	Specification	1	9.3
Issue	Comment	1	1.32

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
The package is currently only compiled for ESM projects, which i…	9.3 content: p: count: 87 score: 1 code: count: 6 score: 1 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1	1	9.3
@0x4007 Well I am billing manager within Ubiquity Org, so the is…	6.6 content: p: count: 33 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1	0.2	1.32

[ubiquibot[bot]]

[ 2.5 WXDAI ]

@0x4007

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	1	2.5

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
I think setting permissions is broken last time we tried. Can ma...	2.5	0.17	2.5

[ 106 WXDAI ]

@gentlementlegen

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Specification	1	24
Issue	Task	1	25
Issue	Comment	1	6.6
Issue	Comment	1	0
Review	Comment	1	33.6
Review	Comment	1	16.8

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
The package is currently only compiled for ESM projects, which i...	24 li: count: 3 score: "3" words: 24 code: count: 4 score: "4" words: 14	1	24
@0x4007 Well I am billing manager within Ubiquity Org, so the is...	6.6	0.3	6.6
@0x4007 Well I am billing manager within Ubiquity Org, so the is...	-	0.3	-
## How to test Create a dummy NodeJs project, with the followin...	33.6 h2: count: 1 score: "2" words: 3 code: count: 7 score: "14" words: 22	0.93	33.6
## How to test Create a dummy NodeJs project, with the followin...	16.8 h2: count: 1 score: "1" words: 3 code: count: 7 score: "7" words: 22	0.93	16.8

[0x4007]

Why is my comment relevance 0 on v2? I expect it to be low but not 0

[gentlementlegen]

@0x4007 miggt be due to either Gpt4 or a multiplier that makes it 0, will have a look

[0x4007]

Relevance made it 0 but ChatGPT I wouldn't expect to return a perfect 0

[gentlementlegen]

I think I defaulted to 0 if there is any bug or crash during the evaluation of relevance to avoid major issues on the final result, which might be the reason.

[0x4007]

In my implementation I made it default to 1 in case of error. Seems unfair to the contributor to not get any credit if there's a bug with the software.

[gentlementlegen]

Added this to the specification.