Closed Hodlatoor closed 6 months ago
They had two vectors for application
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023, 2:21 PM アレクサンダー.eth @.***> wrote:
It isn't clear to me why there are two submissions for this project.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ubiquity/partnerships/issues/38#issuecomment-1619661179, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5CGQTA7ENU5W6WOQVANKG3XOO77HANCNFSM6AAAAAAZ4V6PDQ . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
I am assuming that this can be done within an 8 hour window, but that it will likely be done over several days in short bursts. That's why I set the time to "<1 Day"
I suppose it might be more expressive to rename the Time
labels to be in hours so that it does not imply over how many days, which is more aligned with how we've been using this system e.g. Hours: <8
Unfortunately people tend to conflate a time estimate in hours with an hourly rate, so this could cause issues with how its interpreted, even if the pricing algorithm nets the same amount in the end.
Takes a little bit longer than 8 hours bubba. Also, not everyone works the same way. Some sit for an uninterrupted set block. Some work styles involve stepping away from a task to jump back into it. That's also assuming we have all the pieces and do not need need for input from others or to create new task specific items.
The intent for the time estimate parameter is to estimate work input time, not waiting time.
I am aware of that. Waiting is just one component of what goes into a deliverable and it does go into the overall time use however in the context of what I mentioned above, it is not a primary time function. The other elements are. There are different styles to solve the same problem and they all should be accounted for. #userempathy
Waiting is just one component of what goes into a deliverable and it does go into the overall time use
No lol. Feel free to work on another task while you wait though. Sitting around waiting isn't productive.
@pavlovcik @sergfeldman To clarify some opened tasks by @sergfeldman, the next active phase I see for SAFE and DevPool is on SAFE DAO Forum: https://forum.safe.global/c/proposals/21
which is where we submit the grant proposal for SAFE GRANTS https://safe-global.notion.site/Safe-Grants-7a14a7403f1f44f0bfb236a7521dac91
To reiterate, my idea here was a small grant which provides value for SAFE and easy for us to deploy for a small grant amount which kicks off the formal relationship: Integrate a safe into each bounty hunter account and each project manager. Reason being, a small grant is easy to approve especially considering their limited budget from grants. They get an immense value proposition for the grant amount since as the userbase grows, each user gets onboarded to SAFE and in-turn SAFE benefits immensely from this. Lastly -all the components we need to easily deploy this exist on our end.
@sergfeldman
@pavlovcik when you can, please take a look at the repeating issues which were recently opened and close them if deemed duplicates so that we minimize confusion.
@pavlovcik when you can, please take a look at the repeating issues which were recently opened and close them if deemed duplicates so that we minimize confusion.
Best if you tag @sergfeldman in each questionable issue and discuss one-by-one
@Hodlatoor
If you can keep an eye here with me on when the specs come out that will be great. Then I will finish writing up the grant and we can submit it.
Sure, will do!
Do you want my login for SAFE DAO or want to add your own?
I guess 1 SAFE DAO account is enough for submitting a grant. If we find suitable that I have a separate account, I will create it.
@pavlovcik when you can, please take a look at the repeating issues which were recently opened and close them if deemed duplicates so that we minimize confusion.
I believe that the task I created is not a duplicate of any grant task :) This task was aimed at OTHER (not grant) forms of cooperation with SAFE.
@Hodlatoor
Integrate a safe into each bounty hunter account and each project manager
If you are interested in my opinion, I think that the idea is wonderful for grant.
@Hodlatoor
Integrate a safe into each bounty hunter account and each project manager
If you are interested in my opinion, I think that the idea is wonderful for grant.
of course I am and thanks! that's what I want us to ship to them once they open up .
Update: they are opening this on july 27th.
Do you have any updates @Hodlatoor? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment /unassign
Last activity time: Sat Jul 15 2023 03:35:13 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
keeping open
Do you have any updates @Hodlatoor? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment /unassign
Last activity time: Fri Jul 21 2023 08:10:56 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
waiting on them, still.
Perhaps it makes sense to associate your grant application with this issue and close it. This "task operating system" focuses on work input and compensates for that. We can't control if they respond, I guess.
But the task to "write and submit the grant application by July 31st" technically has been completed, presumably.
Sure. I can close it and keep an eye on them.
0x5c747b83...b37227Dfe
associate your grant application with this issue and close it.
This means to open a pull request with your deliverable.
Right now I just have the intent which i have done previously they had a delay picking out their selection panel so now they pushed back when they open the submission program.
You need to finish the work, deliver it, and pass review to be eligible for bounties. If you don't complete this process then you are not eligible to collect bounties.
@Hodlatoor - Releasing the bounty back to dev pool because the allocated duration already ended! Last activity time: Fri Jul 28 2023 13:31:27 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
they pushed it back: Wave 1 Safe grants applications will open on the 16.08.2023.
@Hodlatoor The time limit for this bounty is on Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:14:41 GMT
they pushed it back: Wave 1 Safe grants applications will open on the 16.08.2023.
Can you link your source?
Do you have any updates @Hodlatoor? If you would like to release the bounty back to the DevPool, please comment /stop
Last activity time: Wed Aug 09 2023 12:14:27 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
updated previously
they pushed it back: Wave 1 Safe grants applications will open on the 16.08.2023.
Can you link your source?
Still waiting on this
@Hodlatoor please be sure to review this conversation and implement any necessary fixes. Unless this is closed as completed, its payment of 300.0 WXDAI will be deducted from your next bounty.
You need to finish the work, deliver it, and pass review to be eligible for bounties. If you don't complete this process then you are not eligible to collect bounties.
This did not pass review and should not have been marked as completed.
You need to finish the work, deliver it, and pass review to be eligible for bounties. If you don't complete this process then you are not eligible to collect bounties.
This did not pass review and should not have been marked as completed.
It was complete the moment it was submitted. And it was submitted. the md file I referenced above is just for our records. it is a copy of what was already submitted on their system.
clarify.
@Hodlatoor please be sure to review this conversation and implement any necessary fixes. Unless this is closed as completed, its payment of 300.0 WXDAI will be deducted from your next bounty.
@Hodlatoor - Releasing the bounty back to dev pool because the allocated duration already ended! Last activity time: Wed Aug 23 2023 14:22:27 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
It isn't clear to me why there are two submissions for this project.