Invalidate nonce

[rndquu]

Owner should be able to invalidate nonce for already signed mint request.

What should be done:

1. Add a new method invalidateNonce() where owner can pass a nonce value and invalidate mint request.
2. Cover with tests the invalidateNonce() method

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! action has an uncaught error

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! action has an uncaught error

[gpylypchuk]

Do you mean a method like this?

function invalidateNonce(uint256 _nonceValue) external onlyOwner {
        nonceRedeemed[_nonceValue] = true;
}

So when your're going to mint, that nonce is already used and the require should fail.

[rndquu]

Do you mean a method like this?

function invalidateNonce(uint256 _nonceValue) external onlyOwner {
        nonceRedeemed[_nonceValue] = true;
}

So when your're going to mint, that nonce is already used and the require should fail.

Exactly

[gpylypchuk]

/start

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! Too many assigned issues, you have reached your max limit

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! action has an uncaught error

[molecula451]

! action has an uncaught error

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! action has an uncaught error

[molecula451]

/query @gpylypchuk

[ubiquibot[bot]]

Property	Value
Wallet	0x3ac293A770B62F7fECCe918dCC361a594b7f68eA

[molecula451]

thanks for the PR @gpylypchuk hold while we get you the bot generate the permit claim to you

[gpylypchuk]

thanks for the PR @gpylypchuk hold while we get you the bot generate the permit claim to you

yes! no problem :)

[0x4007]

Weird that it didn't even start the process here. Maybe I broke it by changing the GitHub secret in the other organization. Although I would've expected a crash after the calculating rewards comment is posted.

[molecula451]

yeah it looks like on the last action it throw the key/pair incorrect that we know

[ubiquibot[bot]]

! action has an uncaught error

[molecula451]

pavlovcik let's not forget to issue this contributors permit

[ubiquibot[bot]]

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

[0x4007]

We can try regenerating here.

[ubiquibot[bot]]

[ 4.2 WXDAI ]

@pavlovcik

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	2	4.2

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Weird that it didn't even start the process here. Maybe I broke ...	3.7	0.01	3.7
We can try regenerating here....	0.5	0.01	0.5

[ 5.5 WXDAI ]

@molecula451

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	4	5.5

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
> ```diff > ! action has an uncaught error > ``` ...	1 code: count: 1 score: "1" words: 0	0.9	1
thanks for the PR @gpylypchuk hold while we get you the bot gene...	1.8	0.02	1.8
yeah it looks like on the last action it throw the key/pair inco...	1.7	0.02	1.7
pavlovcik let's not forget to issue this contributors permit...	1	-	1

[ 26.2 WXDAI ]

@gpylypchuk

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Task	1.00	25
Issue	Comment	2	0
Review	Comment	1	1.2

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Do you mean a method like this? ```solidity function invalid...	- code: count: 1 score: "0" words: 0	1	-
> thanks for the PR @gpylypchuk hold while we get you the bot ge...	-	-	-
> looking good but it left to desire a bit, @gpylypchuk can you ...	1.2 code: count: 1 score: "1" words: 1	0.95	1.2

[ 13.8 WXDAI ]

@rndquu

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Specification	1	12.6
Issue	Comment	1	1.2

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Owner should be able to invalidate [nonce](https://github.com/ub...	12.6 a: count: 1 score: "1" words: 1 li: count: 2 score: "2" words: 26 code: count: 2 score: "2" words: 2	1	12.6
> Do you mean a method like this? > > ```solidity > function...	1.2 code: count: 1 score: "1" words: 0	1	1.2