ubiquity / onboard.ubq.fi

onboard.ubq.fi
0 stars 7 forks source link

refactor: onboard.ubq.fi #1

Closed molecula451 closed 6 months ago

molecula451 commented 6 months ago
ubiquity-os-deployer[bot] commented 6 months ago
1014607
492653a
molecula451 commented 6 months ago

This does it, but!

on live pay.ubq.fi i get: Screenshot from 2024-03-01 16-23-59

which in localhost replicates itself

looks like relates to: https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/pull/154#issuecomment-1950229969

and indeed it's not related to this refactor

@ubiquity/software-development rfc

gentlementlegen commented 6 months ago

@molecula451 Seems to be introduced by changes from https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/commit/3c59ca011f3232a0f33fa54037aadc6cdb91e1c9

defaultConfig used to have a default value, and now defaults to {}, so of course keys is undefined. Sensible fix would be to set some default values so keys exist, or merging an object containing keys into the default config.

molecula451 commented 6 months ago

defaultConfig used to have a default value, and now defaults to {}, so of course keys is undefined. Sensible fix would be to set some default values so keys exist, or merging an object containing keys into the default config.

but as per your comment you are into it? https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/pull/154#issuecomment-1950229969 no? so to clarify it's not part of the refactor (moving repos) to avoid clutter 😄

gentlementlegen commented 6 months ago

@molecula451 This was already created, you can import the package from https://www.npmjs.com/package/@ubiquibot/configuration

molecula451 commented 6 months ago

@molecula451 This was already created, you can import the package from https://www.npmjs.com/package/@ubiquibot/configuration

so we deprecate the submodule import? https://github.com/ubiquity/ubiquibot/tree/cb084909ab332f67bba271b5a17b907d21716bd1

molecula451 commented 6 months ago

leaving it to be part of https://github.com/ubiquity/onboard.ubq.fi/issues/4, it looses scope of https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/issues/171, need further debugging cc @rndquu

gentlementlegen commented 6 months ago

@molecula451 all right will take care of it then, otherwise I am fine with this PR, except the commit messages

molecula451 commented 6 months ago

@molecula451 all right will take care of it then, otherwise I am fine with this PR, except the commit messages

you mean refactor: onboard.ubq.fi #1? , suggest welcome

gentlementlegen commented 6 months ago

image It's preferable to have messages representing the changes done by that commit

molecula451 commented 6 months ago

It's preferable to have messages representing the changes done by that commit

the messages reflect that, if i put "update" on that message it's because i'm updating something, check the committed code for instance, tho everyone workflow it's different, it's good your suggestion tho

molecula451 commented 6 months ago

mergin because @FernandVEYRIER it's taking care of #4 at "development" which basically it's putting the app to work, which is already live bugged at pay.ubq.fi/onboarding