Closed molecula451 closed 6 months ago
This does it, but!
on live pay.ubq.fi i get:
which in localhost replicates itself
looks like relates to: https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/pull/154#issuecomment-1950229969
and indeed it's not related to this refactor
@ubiquity/software-development rfc
@molecula451 Seems to be introduced by changes from https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/commit/3c59ca011f3232a0f33fa54037aadc6cdb91e1c9
defaultConfig
used to have a default value, and now defaults to {}
, so of course keys
is undefined. Sensible fix would be to set some default values so keys
exist, or merging an object containing keys
into the default config.
defaultConfig
used to have a default value, and now defaults to{}
, so of coursekeys
is undefined. Sensible fix would be to set some default values sokeys
exist, or merging an object containingkeys
into the default config.
but as per your comment you are into it? https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/pull/154#issuecomment-1950229969 no? so to clarify it's not part of the refactor (moving repos) to avoid clutter 😄
@molecula451 This was already created, you can import the package from https://www.npmjs.com/package/@ubiquibot/configuration
@molecula451 This was already created, you can import the package from https://www.npmjs.com/package/@ubiquibot/configuration
so we deprecate the submodule import? https://github.com/ubiquity/ubiquibot/tree/cb084909ab332f67bba271b5a17b907d21716bd1
leaving it to be part of https://github.com/ubiquity/onboard.ubq.fi/issues/4, it looses scope of https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/issues/171, need further debugging cc @rndquu
@molecula451 all right will take care of it then, otherwise I am fine with this PR, except the commit messages
@molecula451 all right will take care of it then, otherwise I am fine with this PR, except the commit messages
you mean refactor: onboard.ubq.fi #1
? , suggest welcome
It's preferable to have messages representing the changes done by that commit
It's preferable to have messages representing the changes done by that commit
the messages reflect that, if i put "update" on that message it's because i'm updating something, check the committed code for instance, tho everyone workflow it's different, it's good your suggestion tho
mergin because @FernandVEYRIER it's taking care of #4 at "development" which basically it's putting the app to work, which is already live bugged at pay.ubq.fi/onboarding