Open 0x4007 opened 3 months ago
rfc @ubiquity/software-development @sergfeldman @diamondnegroni
Also @rndquu it would be appreciated if you can set a time estimate on this and scope it out assuming we proceed with this proposal.
If the idea it's primarily to have a L2 because it's architecturally attractive then i woud say yes, i still think our system performs very well on Gnosis Chain
I think this issue should be moved to https://github.com/ubiquibot/permit-generation
Also @rndquu it would be appreciated if you can set a time estimate on this and scope it out assuming we proceed with this proposal.
It's hard to put the time estimate until the plugin is ready
I have some contacts from Base Network. Let me know when is good time to start conversation !
I think this issue should be moved to https://github.com/ubiquibot/permit-generation
Issue doesn't seem to be transferable within orgs
In terms of convenience for new contributors, the more popular the network and the lower the fees, the better. I check L2 activity here https://l2beat.com/scaling/activity
I think Optimism is better actually. I just manually checked Binance and Coinbase and asked Perplexity about the rest of the top 10 exchanges support for it. They all seem to support Optimism but Base is only Coinbase, I guess.
Optimism is lately becoming more a more centralized, i'll be honest from my point of view, so if that is not a concern? we're good
Now that dencun was deployed and L2 fees are really low, perhaps we can do payments on Optimism. It seems to have the lowest fees, a permit2 deployment, and has wider support for CEX cash outs, which may make working with our system more user friendly.
I suspect that net fees should be lower considering bridging costs to cash out to CEX.
https://dune.com/Marcov/layer-2-transaction-cost