Closed gentlementlegen closed 1 month ago
Preview Deployment |
---|
[178998a7cde19aab9341f5f09e0a4e955ed5cb67]() |
[5f95dba0c375b96d7e5dfbecbf18ffc0d4a305bd]() |
64885777f380e84aed74786f38635c429930a41d |
72a877710b661a948628047b1a9089645bbdcaa5 |
Here is a workflow that worked with the fix: https://github.com/gentlementlegen/pay.ubq.fi/pull/15
My guess is that the env variable doesn't match the one in the Workflow file. I do not have access to the settings on this repo so if you could confirm @rndquu that I renamed it properly.
As it can be seen here and here all the other variables are populated and the secrets are enabled.
However it doesn't work on this PR because it seems to keep using the one in the development branch.
Here is a workflow that worked with the fix: gentlementlegen#15
My guess is that the env variable doesn't match the one in the Workflow file. I do not have access to the settings on this repo so if you could confirm @rndquu that I renamed it properly.
As it can be seen here and here all the other variables are populated and the secrets are enabled.
However it doesn't work on this PR because it seems to keep using the one in the development branch.
You may use secrets.UBIQUIBOT_APP_PRIVATE_KEY_TEST
. It is set to private key (with 0x
prefix, not sure if etherjs handles it correctly) for 0xBA742bdBf4eF1e6be8a917Fd2f84BE6C74F8796B
address which has all of the required allowances for using permit2 on gnosis chain. So everything should work once you start using secrets.UBIQUIBOT_APP_PRIVATE_KEY_TEST
. I will DM you PK for future references.
@rndquu The third deployment inside https://github.com/ubiquity/pay.ubq.fi/pull/232#issuecomment-2141328179 seems to work fine with the test key, thank you.
Resolves #195