search

ubiquity / research

3 stars 1 forks source link

Create chaingpt-research.md #140

Closed sergfeldman closed 8 months ago

sergfeldman commented 8 months ago

Resolves #139

sergfeldman commented 8 months ago

@pavlovcik I will be very happy if we achieve such success as ChainGPT. I`ve added a preliminary plan from my point of view.

sergfeldman commented 8 months ago

It seems like a lot of this is bottlenecked by me reviewing. Instead this task was intended for the researcher to provide proposals. I would review the proposals, not the raw research.

@pavlovcik I understand your request to receive a ready-made list of proposals as a result of research. I think that this will not bring a positive result, because it is not incremental specific actions that are important, but the company strategy as a whole. To understand the ChainGPT strategy, we need to dive a little deeper into it.

However, I have added key actions that I think are relevant to us. Please let me know if you want anything else.

0x4007 commented 8 months ago

I think that this will not bring a positive result, because it is not incremental specific actions that are important, but the company strategy as a whole.

I don't understand what you mean. Also, wouldn't it have made more sense to say this on the issue before starting the project if you think it doesn't make sense?

but the company strategy as a whole.

I think I understand now. The purpose of this task is to use them as a case study and then create an actionable set of actions for us that we can apply that makes sense in the context of Ubiquity.

sergfeldman commented 8 months ago

@pavlovcik My thoughts on comparing the approaches of Ubiquity and ChainGPT. Ubiquity has a more rational and substantial approach, and ChainGPT is perceived as more innovative and emotional. Certain actions make sense only in the context of a specific approach.

A few examples:

ChainGPT was accelerated by Seedify and this step is crucial for their growth. Ubiquity did not go through acceleration. It would be possible to add the task “Complete acceleration in Seedify” to the actionable plan.

The founder of ChainGPT is public and actively establishes partnerships. It would be possible to add the task “The founder should go public and actively establish partnerships.”

But I don't think it makes sense for Ubiquity to repeat these specific actions, because we have a different approach. The top 5 recommendations that are relevant to us were added in the commit https://github.com/ubiquity/research/pull/140/commits/d7dfe1ed5a2e28c9e51755c1eac00ac38d741d44

0x4007 commented 8 months ago

@pavlovcik My thoughts on comparing the approaches of Ubiquity and ChainGPT. Ubiquity has a more rational and substantial approach, and ChainGPT is perceived as more innovative and emotional. Certain actions make sense only in the context of a specific approach.

The purpose of this is to translate what they did into the context of what we are doing.

A few examples:

ChainGPT was accelerated by Seedify and this step is crucial for their growth. Ubiquity did not go through acceleration. It would be possible to add the task “Complete acceleration in Seedify” to the actionable plan.

No but instead it would be "Complete acceleration with GitHub" for example.

The founder of ChainGPT is public and actively establishes partnerships. It would be possible to add the task “The founder should go public and actively establish partnerships.”

This should be a list of who we should establish partnerships with, based on what ChainGPT did. Besides, during fundraising we will be getting the team out there to meet with people so executing this is feasible.

But I don't think it makes sense for Ubiquity to repeat these specific actions, because we have a different approach. The top 5 recommendations that are relevant to us were added in the commit d7dfe1e

Those aren't actionable plans. I left comments.