Closed klassenjm closed 3 years ago
The documentation sample for \fv, at https://ubsicap.github.io/usfm/notes_basic/fnotes.html#fv-fv uses "plain" ("non-plussed" / nested) \fv.
\fv
In the context of the sample, and indeed in most contexts, +fv not \fv should be used. This is strongly IMPLIED by the note:
This marker will typically be nested within another footnote content element, like \ft, \fq or \fqa. See Nesting Character Markup for details.
The sample contradicts this by using plain (non-plussed) \fv.
Fixed in a9ba3ca
klassenjm
commented
3 years ago klassenjm
commented
3 years ago
The documentation sample for
\fv, at https://ubsicap.github.io/usfm/notes_basic/fnotes.html#fv-fv uses "plain" ("non-plussed" / nested)\fv.In the context of the sample, and indeed in most contexts, +fv not \fv should be used. This is strongly IMPLIED by the note:
This marker will typically be nested within another footnote content element, like \ft, \fq or \fqa. See Nesting Character Markup for details.
The sample contradicts this by using plain (non-plussed)
\fv.